“State Violence and the Ethics of the Minority Question in Turkey” Conference, LSE, 4 February 2015

We would like to inform you about the public conference entitled “State Violence and the Ethics of the Minority Question in Turkey” which is organized by LSE Contemporary Turkish Studies. Dr. Kabir Tambar, Department of Anthropology, Stanford University, will give a talk in the conference. Associate Professor Esra Ozyurek, Chair of Contemporary Turkish Studies, LSE, will chair this event.

This event will take place from 18:30 to 20:00 on Wednesday, 4 February 2015 at Room NAB1.04, First Floor, New Academic Building, LSE, 54 Lincolns Inn Fields, London, WC2A 3LJ.
This event is free and open to all with no ticket required. Those who might be interested are all welcome. For any queries please email to u.sonmez@lse.ac.uk .
Abstract of the Talk

“State Violence and the Ethics of the Minority Question in Turkey”

The category of “minority” has been constitutive of “the people” in Turkey, distilling those who do not belong to the history and destiny of the nation from those who do. “Minority,” in this sense, is not simply a demographic classification, nor merely a matter of legal recognition. It carries the weight of a historical judgment, which scaffolds ethical community by delineating which populations, languages, and religions remain outside of the framework of collective obligation and responsibility. Dr. Tambar examines comments delivered by a pro-Kurdish political party and a largely Kurdish mothers-of-the-disappeared group during the Gezi Park protests of 2013. These moments of public address participated in the broader spirit of state critique on display during those protests. They were noteworthy, however, for recasting the Gezi events as a late moment in a longer history of state violence, prefigured by a century of dispossession experienced by those who have been classed as minorities or threatened with that designation. The commentaries interrogated what we might call the negative historicity of the minority. They were not primarily aimed at repudiating that historical judgment as discriminatory or contrary to law, but instead sought to delocalize the judgment vested in the category of minority, to see in that judgment an increasingly generalized economy of political abjection, and in effect to view it as prefiguring an ethical community to come.



Loading Facebook Comments ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.